How we review
- Identify the coin or token, network and relevant trading pairs.
- Record observed liquidity and timestamp for each venue.
- Cross-check protocol dependencies and distribution against project documents and block explorers.
Assess crypto risks using liquidity, venues, concentration and protocol data. Includes an order book calculator and research from €45.
First check whether a representative trade could be executed within the relevant price band. Then examine dependence on venues, large holders and protocols. A quoted price alone says little about your ability to exit.
Intended sale ÷ visible bid depth × 100. Use one venue, a fixed price band and one snapshot.
Visible orders can change or disappear. Above 100% means the sale exceeds the entered depth.
Calculated from your inputs only. No automatic data retrieval or investment score.
We rate documented characteristics in each criterion from 0 to 100. 0 means weak, 50 means mixed and 100 means strong. The research score is the sum of each rating × its weight, divided by 100.
The risk score uses its own scale from 0 for low to 100 for substantial evidenced risk. Evidence coverage is the sum of weights for criteria with sufficient evidence. While any criterion remains unresolved, we show the gap and withhold the overall score.
See the fictional score demonstrationIndicative one-time prices refer to the standard scope shown when sufficient data is available. For more complex work, we agree a custom quote first.
One crypto asset and one focused risk question.
A deeper review of venues and holder structure for the same asset.
Cross-check key risk signals and model up to three qualitative liquidity scenarios.
Volume reflects past trading. Execution also depends on spread, available bid depth and distribution across venues.
A native coin usually requires a clear network identifier. For tokens, include the network and contract address.
Publicly labelled exchange, bridge and custody addresses are separated where evidence supports it. Uncertain attribution remains open.
We record the source, venue and timestamp. Conflicting evidence can leave the research score unresolved.
It documents identifiable risk factors and plausible scenarios. It does not quantify the probability of loss.
These sources are starting points. Reports document the evidence actually used and its date, with missing or conflicting data shown separately.
Full research methodologyDescribe the subject and your research question. After reviewing data availability, we confirm the scope, price and delivery date.