How we review
- Identify the contract, implementation and documented admin controls.
- Reconcile circulating supply, allocations and unlock schedules using consistent definitions.
- Record discrepancies among documents, explorer data and announcements.
Review token distribution, unlock schedules and publicly documented contract controls. Free unlock calculator and research packages from €45.
The review starts with the network and contract address. It examines mint, pause and upgrade permissions, token distribution and upcoming unlocks. The key question is whether project claims match verifiable contract evidence.
Newly unlocked tokens ÷ current circulating supply × 100. Use the same unit and exclude tokens already counted in the float.
An unlock describes potentially available tokens. Actual circulation and selling pressure can develop differently.
Calculated from your inputs only. No automatic data retrieval or investment score.
We rate documented characteristics in each criterion from 0 to 100. 0 means weak, 50 means mixed and 100 means strong. The research score is the sum of each rating × its weight, divided by 100.
The risk score uses its own scale from 0 for low to 100 for substantial evidenced risk. Evidence coverage is the sum of weights for criteria with sufficient evidence. While any criterion remains unresolved, we show the gap and withhold the overall score.
See the fictional score demonstrationIndicative one-time prices refer to the standard scope shown when sufficient data is available. For more complex work, we agree a custom quote first.
One token on one network, contract identification and one focus area.
Deeper review of documented admin controls and unlock schedules.
Cross-check major project claims and assess qualitative unlock scenarios.
It helps with inspection. The active implementation, roles, proxy and permissions still need separate review.
Unlocks can increase available supply. Whether unlocked tokens move or are sold is a separate question.
The network, contract address and links to a whitepaper, tokenomics, vesting schedule or audit help focus the review.
Observable transactions and public records can provide clues. Controls that cannot be technically verified remain an explicit gap.
Standard scope is document- and data-based research. An independent code audit requires a separate engagement with a specialist.
These sources are starting points. Reports document the evidence actually used and its date, with missing or conflicting data shown separately.
Full research methodologyDescribe the subject and your research question. After reviewing data availability, we confirm the scope, price and delivery date.