How we review
- Identify the collection, network, contract standard and any migrations.
- Record observed sales, supply and wallet data separately.
- Review project terms and metadata storage using publicly available evidence.
Review NFT collections for holder concentration, trading activity and documented usage rights. Includes a wallet calculator and research from €45.
Check the correct contract, completed sales and distribution across wallets. Review documented usage rights and where metadata lives. A low asking price says little about actual demand or rights.
Supply held by the ten largest wallets ÷ circulating supply × 100. Define treatment of burn, bridge and custody addresses first.
One wallet can represent many owners. One owner can also control several wallets.
Calculated from your inputs only. No automatic data retrieval or investment score.
We rate documented characteristics in each criterion from 0 to 100. 0 means weak, 50 means mixed and 100 means strong. The research score is the sum of each rating × its weight, divided by 100.
The risk score uses its own scale from 0 for low to 100 for substantial evidenced risk. Evidence coverage is the sum of weights for criteria with sufficient evidence. While any criterion remains unresolved, we show the gap and withhold the overall score.
See the fictional score demonstrationIndicative one-time prices refer to the standard scope shown when sufficient data is available. For more complex work, we agree a custom quote first.
One collection, contract identifier and one focus on trading, wallets or documentation.
Deeper cross-check of trading, wallet structure and project documents.
Cross-check unusual patterns and documentation gaps using available evidence.
The floor is usually the lowest visible asking price. The last sale is an observed transaction.
Patterns such as repeated trades between the same wallets can be clues. We distinguish observed patterns from verified statements about intent.
The network and contract address help avoid confusion with copies. For a migration, provide both addresses.
That depends on the applicable project terms. The report records the terms it finds and flags issues for separate legal review.
A small set of addresses holds a large share of the defined supply. Beneficial ownership may differ.
These sources are starting points. Reports document the evidence actually used and its date, with missing or conflicting data shown separately.
Full research methodologyDescribe the subject and your research question. After reviewing data availability, we confirm the scope, price and delivery date.